Upload a photo or take a selfie to get a strict 1 to 10 rating and see your styling potential.
Free, and your photo stays on your device.
Your 1–10 attractiveness rating
Your 1–10 attractiveness rating
Close selfie? Arm's-length photos narrow the jaw and lower your score. Retake from about 1.5 m.
What raises your score
Reach your full styling potential, from one selfie
Free: your face shape, strengths and first styling changes that raise your score.
Start free scanFacial points are mapped automatically on your device.
See how to raise your score, free
Start free scanBone structure stays the same. Hair, brows, a beard and makeup change how your proportions read.
Height on top makes the face read longer.
A parted fringe frames the eyes.
The open forehead shows the full length of the face.
Longer hair and fuller brows frame the face.
CEVO's 169-test reports show this on your own face.
Start free scanTap any card to see what raises that proportion.
The part from between your brows to the base of your nose, next to your whole face height. On most faces it is about a third.
Prop your phone at eye level, about 1.5 m away. Too close, and CEVO asks for another photo.
Free: your face shape, your strengths and your first tips, in plain words.
See how many more tips are waiting for you. Unlock them only if you want them.
Start with one selfie
Your face shape and what suits you, free.
Every point of your face mapped from one selfie, plus a side photo for your profile.
Twelve regions of your face measured, from brows to jawline, plus the age your face reads as.
Hair, brows and skin changed on your photo. Your bone structure stays as it is.
The cuts that suit your face shape, side by side.
Brow shape, beard length and makeup picked for your features.
Hair, skin and grooming steps to follow for 90 days, made for your face.
$29
$59 Recommended
$119
One payment, no subscription. Every report is checked by our team and ready within 24 hours.
5.0 is an average unstyled selfie, 6.5 to 7.5 is above average, and 8+ is rare harmony. We also show your styled potential (up to 9.2).
On a computer, click Phone QR and scan the code with your phone camera. Take a selfie or pick a photo, and it appears on your computer screen.
Head tilt, close-camera warp, squinting and shadows change how your features read. Shoot level from 1.5 m (5 ft) in even front light.
No. You are compared with published adult averages for men or women.
We measure four ratios from 13 points: the middle third of the face, cheekbone width against brow-to-lip height (FWHR), eye tilt, and jaw width against cheekbone width. Each proportion is graded strictly out of 10 against adult averages for your sex, and the overall rating weights your weakest unstyled feature most heavily while calculating how much non-surgical styling can lift it. Below: where your face width sits next to other adults, why random quizzes disagree, the averages, and our sources.
This photo
Typical range: mean ± 1 SD (16th–84th percentile)
Most 1-to-10 tests read a flat photo without knowing how close the camera was, so two photos taken minutes apart can get different numbers, for three reasons:
Face width, which a close phone distorts
Held at arm's length, a phone is much closer to your nose than to the sides of your face: the nose looks about 4% wider and the jaw about 3% narrower at 30 cm than at 1.5 m (CEVO's selfie study; measured against the cheekbones, Ward et al. 2018 put the nose at about 30%). A quiz that grades the raw pixels reads that as a different face. This free test can't tell how close the camera was either, so take your photo from about 1.5 m. The free CEVO scan checks the distance and asks for a retake if you were too close.
Jaw width, which reads narrower up close
Your jaw corners sit further back from the camera than your cheekbones, so a close phone selfie makes the jaw look narrower next to the cheekbones than it is.
The three parts, which shift when the chin tilts
Raising or lowering your chin changes your measured facial thirds and your eye tilt. Many quizzes also grade every face against a single 1.618 mask instead of averages for men and women.
| What gets checked | CEVO |
|---|---|
| Face points mapped | 478 from one selfie |
| Camera distance | Reads your iris size to tell how close the camera was, and asks for a retake if the photo was taken too close |
| Tests | Up to 10 front-view tests, or all 169 tests across 12 regions |
| Compared with | Averages for men and women from published studies |
| Styling plan | Free: your face shape, strengths and first tips. With a report: a natural glow-up and hairstyles on your own face, with your bone structure kept as it is |
| Wait | Ready within 24 hours after your photos are accepted |
Studies of why a face looks balanced (Pallett et al. 2010; Little et al. 2011) find two things. Attractiveness comes from how your features fit together as ratios, not from one extreme feature, and most adults sit close to the average. These are the four measurements and their averages. The edge points the AI finds on the cheekbones and jaw sit a little inside the bone points these studies measured, so this test counts a wider band as average for face width and jaw:
| Facial proportion | What it means | Men average (mean ± SD) | Women average (mean ± SD) | Typical range (16th–84th %ile) | What a close selfie does |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertical facial thirds | Splits your face height into 3 vertical sections: forehead (hairline to brows), midface (brows to the base of the nose) and lower face (base of the nose to the chin). | 33.1% ± 2.4% (middle) | 33.6% ± 2.2% (middle) | 30.7%–35.5% (M) · 31.4%–35.8% (W) | Shifts when the chin tilts up or down |
| Cheekbone-to-height ratio (FWHR) | How wide your outer cheekbones are, divided by the height from your eyebrows to your upper lip. Does not include forehead or chin. | 1.84 ± 0.13 | 1.79 ± 0.12 | 1.71–1.97 (M) · 1.67–1.91 (W) | Reads lower in close selfies |
| Eye tilt angle (canthal tilt) | The upward or downward angle from your inner eye corner to your outer eye corner, measured with your pupils level. | +3.1° ± 1.9° | +4.2° ± 2.0° | +1.2° to +5.0° (M) · +2.2° to +6.2° (W) | Reads less tilted if the camera is low |
| Jaw-to-cheekbone taper | How wide your jaw corners are compared to your cheekbones. Determines whether your lower face looks V-tapered, oval, or square. | 82.5% ± 4.8% (3D scans) | 76.2% ± 4.5% (3D scans) | 77.7%–87.3% (M) · 71.7%–80.7% (W) | Reads narrower in close selfies |
A number on its own doesn't tell you what to do next. These three everyday changes matter most:
If your face is wide for its height, some textured height on top with tapered sides makes it look longer. If your face is long and narrow, or the forehead is tall, keep fuller scissor-cut sides and let a curtain fringe or French crop fall across the forehead. See our full FWHR Haircut Guide.
The bone around your eyes is fixed, but the lines just above them change how tilted your eyes look. Tidying the hairs under a low outer brow tail while keeping the inner brow full makes the eyes look a little more upturned. If the middle of your face is longer than typical in the table above, glasses with a straight, solid top bar break up its length. The canthal tilt calculator shows your own eye angle.
If your jaw is narrow next to your cheekbones or the lower part of your face is short, squared stubble at the jaw corners and chin makes the jaw read a little wider. If the space between your nose and upper lip is long, a moustache that just covers the top edge of the lip makes it look shorter.
Ward B, Ward M, Fried O, Paskhover B (2018). Nasal Distortion in Short-Distance Photographs: The Selfie Effect. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 20(4), 333–335.
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0009PMID: 29494735
Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, et al. (2005). International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 16(4), 615–646.
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9ePMID: 16096529
Pallett PM, Link S, Lee K (2010). New "golden" ratios for facial beauty. Vision Research, 50(2), 149–154.
Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659.
Kramer RSS (2017). Sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in human skulls and faces: A meta-analytical approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(3), 414–420.
